Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37871 (KAR)

TIMMPPA H v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/100974/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13079 WP No. 100974 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 100974 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: TIMMPPA H AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC. CLEANER GOVERNMENT MEDICAL AND DENTAL COLLEGE, VIMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE BALLARI 583104, (ABOVE SAID PETITIONER IS WORKING IN VIMS CAMPUS, BALLARI) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B. RADDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CHIEF SECRETARY TO MEDICAL EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001. 2. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (VIMS) DENTAL COLLEGE, BALLARI 583104. 3. THE DIRECTOR (VIMS) DENTAL COLLEGE, BALLARI 583104. 4. THE PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (VIMS), BALLARI 583104. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13079 WP No. 100974 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED. 20-02-2020 MADE BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION OF THEIR SERVICES AND PROVIDE ALL SERVICE BENEFITS, ARREARS ACCORDING TO LAW, VIDE ANNEXURE-F DATED. 20-02-2020. B) REGULARIZE THE PETITIONER SERVICES AND PROVIDE ALL LEGAL BENEFITS, ARREARS ACCORDING TO THE COVERED BY JUDGEMENT IN WRIT PETITION NO. 145046/2020 DATED. 09- 08-2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM/CT:PA List No.: 3 Sl No.: 26