M/s Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Dharmendra Kumar AND ANOTHER
WPMS/618/2016 · 2025-09-25
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3787 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3787 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 63 (2)
WPMS No. 618 of 2016 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Ms. Devika Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. M.S. Pant, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the above statement, the writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.09.2025
Jitendra