Repaka Sanyasi Setty v. The State of A.P And Another
CRLRC/2413/2018 · 2025-07-03
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37866 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010666192018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2413/2018 Between:
1. REPAKA SANYASI SETTY, HINDU, EMPLOYEE IN B.S.N.L, R/O.
D.NO.26-40, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, S.KOTA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZINAGARAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P AND ANOTHER, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANHDRA PRADESH
2. KONTI SURESH, HINDU, R/O. OPP.RTC COMPLEX IN GATE, S.KOTA VILLAGE, AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records pertaining to the order dated 27.06.2018 in Crl.M.P. 339/2016 in C.C No. 241/2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Srungavarapukota and set aside the same by allowing Crl.M.P.339/2016 in C.C 241/2013 in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the further proceedings in C.C No. 241/2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Srungavarapukota including the personal
2
appearance of the petitioner and accused pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 6-09-2018 until further orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner and the respondent No.2. 2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, having seen the information from E-Courts, submits that the main case i.e., C.C.No.241 of 2013 was dismissed as withdrawn vide judgment dated 13.02.2019. 3. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 4. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR.
Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 SCS
3
126
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2413 of 2018
Date:04.07.2025
SCS