RAMZAN KHAN CHEETA S/O LATE ALADIN CHEETA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14723/2025 · 2025-10-14
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37863 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37863 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42068] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14723/2025 Ramzan Khan Cheeta S/o Late Aladin Cheeta, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Somalpur, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Collector Cum Ex-Officio, Chairman, Ajmer Development Authority, Ajmer.
3. Commissioner, Ajmer Development Authority, Ajmer Rajasthan Formerly Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Pareek, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 14/10/2025
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordships may most graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition- (i) By issuing appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representation of petitioner regarding regularisation (Niyaman) of land in favour of petitioner and decide the matter of petitioner in light of various circular/letter issued by U.D.H. Department State of Rajasthan (Annexure-1); (ii) Any other appropriate writ, order or directions, in the present facts and
[2025:RJ-JP:42068] (2 of 2) [CW-14723/2025] circumstances of the case, which are deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioner; (iii) The writ petition be allowed through-out costs in favour of the petitioner."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted numerous representations before the respondents, however, they have not paid any heed to it and have not decided the same yet, therefore, the petition may be disposed of at this stage, directing the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner in a time bound manner.
3. In that view of the matter, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the representations submitted by the petitioner, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Office is directed to send the copy of this order to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 for compliance.
5. Stay application and all other pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /22