2025:CGHC:45280 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9036 of 2025 1 - Balvinder Kaur W/o Mr. Rajinder Singh Aged About 50 Years Post Head Master Primary, Posted At Govt. Primary School, Aadafarsi, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 2 - Mrs. Reetika Kawde W/o Mr. Dilip Kawde Aged About 45 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Primary School, P.V. 75, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 3 - Dinker Lal Sahu S/o Mr. Keshav Ram Sahu Aged About 48 Years Post Lecturer Local Body, Posted At Govt. High School, Chandipur, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 4 - Nirmala Taram D/o Mr. Late Mr. Samaru Ram Taram Aged About 46 Years Post Assistant Teacher, Local Body, Posted At Govt. Primary Schoo, P.V 74 Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 5 - Mrs. Shashikala Kunjam W/o Mr. Chandrashekhar Aged About 34 Years Post Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt.Upper Primary School, P.V. 09, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Sanju Kar D/o Mr. Swapan Kar Aged About 37 Years Post Assistant Teacher (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Primary School, P.V. 77, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 7 - Mrs. Mamta Dugga W/o Mr. Vimal Dugga Aged About 37 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Primary School. P.V. 37, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 8 - Mrs. Pinki Karmkar W/o Mr. Kamal Karmkar Aged About 38 Years Post Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School, P.V. 37, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 9 - Jaydev Chandra Bala S/o Mr. Bhoanath Aged About 43 Years Post Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School, Hanker, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 10 - Rupa Markam D/o Mr. Bhar Singh Aged About 35 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Primary School, Hanker, Block- Koilibeda, Distt.- Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.12 16:06:38 +0530 Wps 9036 of 2025 2 2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bahwan, Naya Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Lok Shikshan, Chhattisgarh, Block C Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur 4 - District Education Officer District Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Keshav Gupta, GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 04.09.2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in this petition is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman/ Time Pay Scale. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the Time Pay Scale, some Circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt Sona Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others in WA-261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitled for the Kramonnati Vetanman / Time Pay Scale. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA-261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to the respondents concerned/ competent authority, annexing all relevant documents, and Wps 9036 of 2025 3 judgment of this Court passed in WA-261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents concerned/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the Circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA-261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, and it is for respondents concerned to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma