APHC010671012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 32298/2018 Between: 1. M/S. ALMAHABOOB SUBHANI EX. SERVICEMEN ENTERPRISES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR , S.MAHABOOB BASHA, S/O. S. ABDUL SATTAR, AGED 56 YEARS, MUSLIM, D.NO. 3/125, MAJARA ALANKHANPALLI, KADAPA TOWN, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT-515 004, A.P ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA MANDAL, KADAPA TOWN, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in seizing the stocks of White Kerosene Oil i.e.,10,700 liters by conducting Panchanama 21-08-2018 of the petitioner is illegal, improper and arbitrary VS,J W.P No.32298 of 2018 2 without any power of authority under law and violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to release the entire seized stock i.e., 10,700 liters of White Kerosene Oil of the petitioner basing on the Panchanama dated: 21.08.2018 of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) VS,J W.P No.32298 of 2018 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:02.09.2025 KGR