2025:KER:22179 WP(C) No.7116 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 7116 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: 1 ANTONY M. DAVIS, AGED 41 YEARS S/O DAVIS, MANADAN HOUSE, POTTA DESOM, PERAMBRA VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680722 2 STEPHIN M DAVIS, AGED 38 YEARS S/O DAVIS, MAANADAN HOUSE, POTTA DESOM, PERAMBRA VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680722 BY ADVS. ARUN ASHOK NEENA JAMES ANASWARA K.P. RESPONDENT/S: 1 CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, CHALAKUDY P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY IT’S SECRETARY, PIN - 680307 2 ENGINEERING SECTION, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, CHALAKUDY P O, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY IT’S SECRETARY, PIN - 680307 3 MARY (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 4 ROSILY (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 5 THANKAMMA (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 6 ANNIE FRANCIS (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 2025:KER:22179 WP(C) No.7116 OF 2025 2 14.03.2025.) 7 GRACY (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 8 LISSY (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 9 ALWIN (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 0 EDWIN (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 11 DAISY WILSON (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 12 SMERA (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X 13 ANNIE DAVIS (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IN IA 1/2025 DATED 14.03.2025.) X BY ADVS. SHEEJO CHACKO LIKHITHA E.S(K/279/2014) S.S.SAILAKSHMI(K/736/2009) SONITH THOMAS CHACKO(K/000499/2024) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:22179 WP(C) No.7116 OF 2025 3 J U D G M E N T The petitioners’ case is that, on the property in which the petitioners have also right, certain constructions works are carried out by the party respondents without any authorisation. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner submitted a complaint before the 1st respondent Municipality, requesting for canceling the permit granted in respect of the said property. The limited relief sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent Municipality to take a decision, after hearing the effected parties. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing counsel for the Municipality, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that, the 1st respondent shall ensure that a competent officer under the said respondent considers Ext.P1 application and takes a decision on the same, after hearing the petitioner and respondents 3 to 13, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE SM/27.03 2025:KER:22179 WP(C) No.7116 OF 2025 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7116/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A PHOTO COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22-01-2025 IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P1. Exhibit P2 A PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR EXT P1 DATED 22-01-2025 IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P2 Exhibit P3 A PHOTO COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 24-01-2025 IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P3. Exhibit P4 A PHOTO COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR EXT-P3 DATED 24-01-2025 IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MARKED AS EXHIBIT P4. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE