2025:JHHC:23152 1 W.P.(C) No. 328 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 328 of 2024 Bhola Dom, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Prayag Dom, Resident of Near Adipalli, Durga Mandap, Rangamati West P.O. & P.S.-Chandrapura, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand). ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O.-Koyla Nagar, P.S.-Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). 2. The Director (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O.-Koyla Nagar, P.S.-Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). 3. The Chief Vigilance Officer, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Koyla Bhawan, P.O.-Koyla Nager, P.S.-Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). 4.Srikant Basfor, Son of Banshi Basfor, presently working in safai karamchari, Category-III, Unit-AHQ, PP. No. 1144252 BCCL Central Hospital, P.O. Jagjivan Nagar P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkand) presently residing at New Murli Nagar, Behind Shiv Mandir, P.O.-BCCL Township, P.S.-Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Resp.-BCCL : Mrs. Alpana Verma, Advocate 06/11.08.2025 The writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s): For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s) /direction(s) upon the Respondent Authorities for initiating an investigation against Srikant Basfor @ Bhola Dom, who is presently working as a safai karmchari in Category-III, BCCL Central Hospital by misrepresenting himself as Bhola Dom @ Srikant Basfor, Son of Late Prayag Dom and is continuously working on such a false misrepresentation since 1989 and thus, have shattered the legitimate claim and entitlement of the Petitioner, who is original Bhola Dom, Son of Late Prayag Dom. AND/OR The Petitioner further prays that after the completion of investigation, the Respondent No. 4 be suitably punished in 2025:JHHC:23152 2 W.P.(C) No. 328 of 2024 accordance with law for such a false misrepresentation in the matter of appointment in government service. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-BCCL is present and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty