VEENA DEVI v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION HPPWD MANDI AND ANR
CMP.M/1913/2025 · 2025-12-04
Sushil Kukreja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37849 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37849 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Veena Devi Vs. LAC & anr.
CMP(M) No.1913 of 2025 04.12.2025 Present: Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents/State.
CMP(M) No.1913 of 2025 No reply is intended to be filed and the learned Additional Advocate General has no objection in case the present application is allowed.
Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant, the same is allowed and delay of 116 days in filing the appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby condoned. The application stands disposed of. RFA
No.
of 2025 (
RFAST
No.
49030/
/ 2025
) Appeal be registered. Admit. Call for the records. List for final hearing in due course alongwith RFA No.96 of 2025. ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge December 04, 2025 (V.Himalvi)