Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37841 (JHR)

SHIW VILAS SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/245/2025 · 2025-11-07

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33287 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.245 of 2025 ----- Shiw Vilas Sah, son of late Prahlad Sah, resident of Rameshwar Apartment, Flat No. 302, Radium Road, PO GPO, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Shri Rahul Kumar Purwar, Higher & Technical Education Department. Govt. of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Yojna Bhawan, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi 3.Shri George Kumar, Joint Secretary, Higher & Technical Education Department. Govt. of Jharkhand, Yojna Bhawan, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi 4.Shri D. K. Singh, Jharkhand Technical University, Ranchi through its Vice Chancellor, Sirkha Toli, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi 5.Shri Nishant Kumar, Registrar (Incharge) Jharkhand Technical University, Ranchi, Sirkha Toli, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi 6.Shri Rajesh Kumar, Government Polytechnic, Dhanbad, through its Principal/Incharge Principal, PO and PS Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 7.Shri R. K. Agrawal, Accountant General (A&E), North Office Para, Shymali, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC-I Mr. Miher Kunal Ekka, AC to SC-I For Accountant General : Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocate For the JTU : Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate …...... 03 /07.11.2025: After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the opposite parties in their show cause have stated that they are ready with the cheque which the petitioner has to collect. 2. The petitioner is disputing the quantum. 3. Thus, in my opinion this is not a matter where contempt proceeding needs to be initiated. It cannot be said that there is willful violation of the order dated 05.08.2024 passed in WP(S) No. 938 of 2024. 4. It is expected that the opposite parties will credit the amount in the account of the petitioner after the petitioner 2025:JHHC:33287 2 handover the document or give written information that the documents which the opposite parties are claiming is not with the petitioner. 5. This contempt application is dropped. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 07.11.2025 Tanuj/CP-2