R.SUNKANNA v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND 3 OTHERS
AS/930/2010 · 2025-03-12
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37838 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37838 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010668462010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 930/2010 Between:
1. R.SUNKANNA, S/O. R.SUNKANNA BUSINESS D.NO. 18/775/4 TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND 3 OTHERS, A.P.TRANSCO, ANANTAPUR
2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.TRANSCO, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR
3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.TRANSCO, GUINTAKAL, ANANTAPUR
4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.930 OF 2010 J U D G M E N T:
Ms.G.Anusha, learned counsel representing for the appellant would submit that no instructions are received from the legal representatives of the appellant to take steps to implead legal representatives, since the appellant died, and earlier a memo was also filed reporting no instructions for the appellant.
2. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution by the legal representatives of the appellant. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
12.03.2025 Pmk
22
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
APPEAL SUIT No.930 OF 2010
Date:12.03.2025 Pmk