Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37833 (CHH)

REKHARAM VERMA @ REKHARAM LODHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

ACQA/1017/2024 · 2025-10-14

Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 1017 of 2024 Rekharam Verma @ Rekharam Lodhi, S/o. Late Sundarlal Verma @ Sundarlal Lodhi, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Village Patharrikhurd, Post Parpodi, Tahsil Saja, District Bemetara (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station - Ghumka, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2 - Lokesh Verma S/o. Shri Kartikram Verma Aged About 30 Years R/o. Village - Irayeekhurd, Police Station - Ghumka, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Kartikram Verma S/o. Late Parasram Verma Aged About 62 Years R/o. Village - Irayeekhurd, Police Station - Ghumka, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Janak Bai Wd/o. Late Kartikram Verma Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village - Irayeekhurd, Police Station - Ghumka, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : None For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judgment on Board 15/10/2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.15 17:52:51 +0530 2 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE JUDGE Prashant