1 2025:CGHC:11628 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate SA No. 43 of 2023 1 - Vikram Soni S/o Basant Soni Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Rivapara Tahseel And District - Mungeli At Present R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara Mungeli, Tahseel And District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Lakshmi Kant Soni S/o Basant Soni Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Rivapara Tahseel And District - Mungeli At Present R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara Mungeli, Tahseel And District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Smt. Meerabai W/o Salikram Soni Aged About 63 Years R/o Jawahar Chowk, Ward No. 06 Aarang Tahseel Aarang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Geetabai W/o Pawan Singh Aged About 59 Years R/o Brahmanpara Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Manjubai W/o Kishor Soni @ Kedar Soni Aged About 54 Years R/o Sonipara Aarang Tahseel- Aarang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Pushpabai W/o Ashok Soni Aged About 52 Years R/o Sanjay Nagar Main Road Raipur,tahseel - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Lata Soni W/o Dilip Soni Aged About 48 Years R/o Durga Mandir Kalipara Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Madhu Saraf W/o Sunil Saraf Aged About 35 Years Sakin Sanjay Nagar Tikrapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Basant Soni S/o Late Balram Soni Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Rivapara Tahseel And District - Mungeli At Present R/o Hiralal Ward Daupara Mungeli, Tahseel And District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.03.10 11:29:44 +0530 2 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Government Advocate AWARD (Passed on 08.03.2025) 1. This second appeal has been admitted for hearing by this Court on 09.05.2023. 2. All the appellants and respondents are present in person present before this Court today for settling their dispute. 3. During pendency of the second appeal, the appellants and the respondents who are family members, have decided to amicably settle inter se dispute between them. Accordingly, they have jointly filed a compromise application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. supported by affidavit of the parties. They have settled their dispute in view of clause B of prayer of the compromise application, which reads as under:- “B. As per the settlement deed, the khasra no. 102 area 4.62 acre/1.870 hectare and khasra no. 25/1 area 1.38 acre/0.558 hectare out of total area 2.525 hectare will be decree in the share of respondents no. 1 to 6 and the rest of suit land bearing khasra no. 23, 24, 49 and 57 area measuring 0.340 hectare, 0.368, 0.028 and 0.085 hectare and rest of area 1.967 hectare of khasra no. 25/1 situated at village Rivapara Patwari Halka no. 8 Tahsil and District Mungeli shall be decreed as title holder and possessor in favour of respondent no. 7.” 4. The judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court are modified in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties mentioned at clause B of prayer of the compromise application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. 3 5. Accordingly, the instant second appeal stands disposed of. 6. The settlement arrived at between the parties as mentioned at clause B of prayer of the compromise application will be part and partial of the award and decree. 7. A decree be drawn up accordingly. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Sd/- (Ashok Kumar Verma) Member- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bhumika