[2025:RJ-JP:42222] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15038/2025 1. Prahlad Regar Son Of Shri Panna Lal Regar, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of V/p. Lakhanpur, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 2. Braham Singh Bairwa Son Of Nathuram Bairwa, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of V/p. Maharawand, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 3. Girraj Prasad Bairwa Son Of Shri Gopal Bairwa, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Village Gadota, Post Mamdoli, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 4. Hemraj Bairwa Son Of Shri Prabhu Lal Bairwa, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Jatawati, Post Hindupura, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawaimadhpur (Raj.) 5. Kedar Mal Jat Son Of Shri Kalyan Mal Jat, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Khidki, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Sawaimadhopur. 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gottam For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:42222] (2 of 3) [CW-15038/2025] “1) The Hon'ble Court may be declare arbitrary, discriminatory action of the respondents by which the respondents not made payment of salary to the petitioners and continuously economically exploiting to the petitioners; ii) Further may be directed to the respondents to made due payment of salary to the petitioners from January 2025 along with interest @ 9% P.A.; iii) Further may kindly be directed to the respondents department to initiate departmental proceedings against the concerned officer/ authority, who are liable to not made payment of salary of petitioners since January 2025; iv) Any other appropriate order, or direction which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper in favour of the appellant may also kindly be passed.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a detailed representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of four weeks raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the [2025:RJ-JP:42222] (3 of 3) [CW-15038/2025] respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /68