N. Chandra Sekhar Reddy, v. The Project Officer, D.W.M.A.,
WP/6036/2013 · 2025-03-12
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37825 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37825 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010662172013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6036/2013 Between: N. Chandra Sekhar Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The Project Officer D W M A and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
2 The Court made the following order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are no specific instructions from the petitioner and it is left open to this Court to pass appropriate orders.
This Court presumes that due to efflux of time, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication.
Therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if at all the petitioner is aggrieved, he may file an application for restoration and the same will be considered in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 12.03.2025
KBN
3 35 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6036 of 2013
Date: 12.03.2025
KBN