SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA SON OF SHRI GYARSI LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15010/2025 · 2025-10-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37824 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37824 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40958] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15010/2025 Surendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Gyarsi Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Peelwa, Post Chandwaji, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Secondary Education Department, Through Its Principle Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Raj.)
3. Director, Education Department, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Mr. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking following relief:- (i) The respondents may be directed to accept the offline/online form of petitioner and allow him to participate in the examination and further selection process of school lecturer under advertisement dated 17.07.2025 in the larger interest of justice. (ii) The respondents may further be directed to give appointment to petitioner on the post of Lecturer School Education, in pursuant to advertisement dated 17.07.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:40958] (2 of 3) [CW-15010/2025] (iii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Cost of the writ petitioner be also awarded in favour of the petitioner. 2. The basic grievance of present petitioner is that he could not filled application form for the post of Lecturer School Education in pursuant to advertisement dated 17.07.2025 by RPSC. A prayer is made for acceptance of offline form and provisional permission for appearance in said examination. 3. Having considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner, wherein he prayed for disposal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks from from now, raising ground of unresponsive or unavailability of facility of filing of online application form on last day due to server down. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent within a period of two weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation.
After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:40958] (3 of 3) [CW-15010/2025]
5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /24