[2025:RJ-JP:36575] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14758/2024 1. Fujel Khan S/o Anish Khan, Aged About 4 Years, Through His Natural Guardian Father Anish Khan S/o Hargun, R/o Kirwada, Tehsil Todabhim, District Gangapurcity. 2. Anish Khan S/o Hargun, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ayyapur Kirwada, Tehsil Todabhim, District Gangapurity. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Kalusingh S/o Kanaram, R/o Radhakishanpura Sirsi, P.s. Harmada, District Jaipur (Rural (Vehicle Driver) 2. Radheshyam Agarwal S/o Ramswaroop Agarwal, R/o 16, Jagamba Colony, Nayakheda, Ambabadi, Jaipur (Owner Of Vehicle). 3. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Branch Manager, Kachhari Road, Gangapur City. (Authorised Insurance Company Truck No. Rj14-Gg 3301) 4. Ramjano Bano Widow Of Munshi Khan, R/o Chuligate, Near Madina Masjid, Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur Now District Gangapurcity. 5. Shakil Ahmad S/o Munshi Khan, R/o Chuligate, Near Madina Masjid, Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur Now District Gangapurcity. 6. Imram Khan S/o Munshi Khan, R/o Chuligate, Near Madina Masjid, Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur Now District Gangapurcity. 7. Mohsin Khan S/o Munshi Khan, R/o Chuligate, Near Madina Masjid, Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur Now District Gangapurcity. 8. Shahanaj Bano D/o Munshi Khan (Since Deceased), R/o Chuligate, Near Madina Masjid, Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur Now District Gangapurcity. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/09/2025 1. Heard the contentions put-forth and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:36575] (2 of 2) [CW-14758/2024] 2. The present petition is filed assailing the order dated 01.08.2024. The relevant portion of which is extracted as under: “mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh o fjiksVZ fyfid dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA eqrkfcd fjiksVZ fyfid izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fnukad 03- 03-2021 gks pqdk gSA dqy vokMZ jkf’k chek dEiuh }kjk tek djok;h tk pqdh gS ftlesa ls ’kgukt ds fgLls dh jkf’k 500000@&:i;s v{kjs ikap yk[k :i;s dks NksMdj ’ks"k jkf’k dk Hkqxrku fd;k tk pqdk gS ftlds laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k QqtSy [kku o vuh’k [kku tks fd e`rdk ’kgukt ds dze’k% iq= o ifr gS rFkk jetkuks tks fd e`rdk dh ekrk gS] ds }kjk Dyse jkf’k ds gdnkj gksuk dfFkr djrs gq;s Dyse jkf’k fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n``"VkUr :[klkuk ¼Jhefr½ o vU; cuke ut:fulk ¼Jhefr½ ¼2009½ 9 ,l0lh0lh0 240 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd e`rd dh e`R;q ij eqvkots ds :i esa jkf’k Lohd``r gksus ij dsoy flfoy U;k;ky; ds }kjk ;g r; fd;k tkosxk fd ilZuy ykW ds ykxw gksus ds vuqlkj e`rd ds dkSu fof/kd izfrfuf/k gS rFkk og fdrus fgLls ds gdnkj gS\ vr% mijksDr U;kf;d n``"VkUr ds izdk’k esa nksuks izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fQygky bl izdze ij vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;s tkrs gSA bl ckcr~~ mHk;i{kdkjku mfpr eap@vf/kdj.k@U;k;ky; ls mfpr vkns’k izkIr dj iqu% izkFkZuk i= is’k djus gsrq Lora= jgsaxsA mDr nksuksa izkFkZuk i= layXu ewy i=koyh jgsaA ” 3. In the impugned order learned court observed that when personal laws are being made applicable upon any subject matter or dispute, the claim entitled for compensation qua the legal representatives of the deceased can be efficaciously decided by the Civil Court, and the same ought not be adjudicated by the MACT; it is also noted that the order so assailed is a speaking order, and warrants no judicial consideration of this Court. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition stand disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Civil Court for redressal of his grievances. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/69