2025:HHC:39118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.627 of 2019 Decided on : 19.11.2025 __________________________________________________________ Dr. Surender Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Arshita Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Ms. Arshita Sharma, Advocate, on Instructions of Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, as received from Dr. Surender Kumar Sharma, states that due to intervening and subsequent events, the proceedings may be given a closure. [Statement is taken on record] 2. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed. 3. Accordingly, in terms of the Statement of Learned Counsel for petitioner, the instant petition 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:39118 is disposed of in aforesaid terms and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 19, 2025 [Bhardwaj]