Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37810 (RAJ)

AFSAR KHAN CONSTABLE NO. 736 (BARRAN)/ 886(KOTA CITY) v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15369/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41786] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15369/2025 Afsar Khan Constable No. 736 (Barran)/ 886(Kota City), Aged About 38 Years, S/o Of Sh. Abdul Vhab, Present Working At Police Station-Khetoni, Kota City, Kota- (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Home Department, Secretariat, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter (Phq), Lalkothi, Jaipur-302015 3. Inspector General Of Police, District Barran, Rajasthan. 4. Superintendent Of Police, District-Barran, Rajasthan. 5. Superintendent Of Police, District Kota City, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. The controversy in the writ petition is denial of grant of ACP on ground of censure recorded in year 2013. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018 submits that penalty of censure does not come in the way while consideration of candidature for grant of ACP to the petitioner by the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:41786] (2 of 2) [CW-15369/2025] 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned AAG candidly admits the case of present petitioner is squarely covered with judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and he submits that he has no objection in case, a direction is passed for consideation of case of petitioner based on ratio in said judgment to consider case for grant of ACP to the petitioner. 4. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties, and also on perusal of judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra), the respondents are directed to consider case of grant of ACP to the petitioner in light of judgment as referred hereinabove. Needless to say that compliance has to be made within 60 days from date of receipt of copy of the order. 5. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /85