902-APL-957-2025 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 957 OF 2025 Dagdu Gundu Kamble And Ors. ..… Applicant VERSUS Priyanka Pradip Kamble And Anr. ..… Respondents ... Adv. Kalyani Mangave (Through VC) a/w Adv. Siddhesh Kadam, Advocates for Applicant. Mr. Abhinav Tayade (Through VC) a/w Adv. Chinmay Patil, Adv. Giridhar S. Koli, Advocates for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for Respondent No. 2-State. ... CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Yesterday, when the matter was on board, during the course of hearing, a query was put to the learned Advocate for Respondent No. 1 as to what does Respondent No. 1 intend to do regarding the proceedings initiated against Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 before the learned Trial Court, i.e. whether Respondent No. 1 intends to continue with the proceedings against Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 before the learned Trial Court or otherwise. As such, he sought time. 2. Today, on instructions from Respondent No. 1, he submits that Respondent No. 1 does not want to proceed against Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 and undertakes to withdraw the proceedings against them before the learned Shubham TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.08.29 10:46:10 +0530 902-APL-957-2025 (CR).odt Trial Court on or before the next date, i.e. 28.09.2026 before the learned Trial Court. His statement is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. 3. In response, the learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions, submits that Applicant No. 3 does not wish to proceed with the Application and seeks withdrawal of the proceedings to his extent. Her statement is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. 4. In view of the above submissions, it appears that Respondent No. 1, who is the Applicant before the learned Trial Court, undertakes to withdraw the proceedings against Applicant Nos. 1 and 2. Therefore, it is not necessary to pass any order on this Application at this stage. However, the Application can be kept for noting compliance with the undertaking given by Respondent No. 1 to this Court. 5. Similarly, Applicant No. 3 does not wish to proceed with the Application. Hence, the Application stands dismissed as withdrawn insofar as Applicant No. 3 is concerned. 6. In view of the above, the Application is disposed of and kept for compliance on 1st October, 2026. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shubham