GOVIND SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/12569/2025 · 2025-05-06
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73964 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12569 of 2025 Applicant :- Govind Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Fakhruzzaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
1.
Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to correct the prayer clause during the course of the day.
2. Sri Fakhruzzaman, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Alok Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
3. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 16 of 2023, arising out of N.C.R. No. 16 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station Konch, District Jalaun at Orai as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 6.1.2023 pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Konch, District Jalaun.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the cognizance/summoning order dated 6.1.2023 has been passed against the applicants and the magistrate took cognizance as a police case, which is against the provision of Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504 of I.P.C. is non-cognizable offence and as per provision of Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. the case could not be a State case and it has been proceeded as a State case, the cognizance/ summoning order is an abuse of the process of law.
6. Section 2(d) of Cr.P.C. is reproduced herein below: (d)"complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some
2 person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report. Explanation.-A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint, and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant;
7. A bare perusal of explanation added to Section 2(d) shows that this explanation speaks about cases where police has investigated a case but investigation made discloses a non-cognizable offence. Such report shall be deemed to be a complaint.
8. In view of what has been stated above, the present application is
disposed of. The order impugned dated 6.1.2023 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Konch, District Jalaun is, hereby, quashed. The matter is remanded back to the court concerned and the Magistrate is directed to pass a fresh order after applying the judicial mind.
Order Date :- 7.5.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad