Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 2503 of 2025
Date of Decision: 11.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Tanu Dogra
……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Naresh Kaul and Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record communication dated 12.11.2025 issued under the signature of Secretary (AH) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that present petition has been rendered infructuous for the reason that petitioner herein has been given station of choice i.e. Veterinary Hospital Gangath, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh.
2
2.
Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of.
December 11, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge