IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18244 of 2025 alongwith CWP No.18348 of 20025 Decided on: 26th November, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.18244 of 2025 Ashish Thakur …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.18348 of 2025 Sahil Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2- State in both the matters. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3 in both the matters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikrant Thakur, learned Standing Counsel, appear and waive service of notice on 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of following substantive prayer:- CWP No.18244 of 2025 “(i) That the respondent may very kindly be directed to re- check the answer of question No.17 in Series ‘C’ and respondent may very kindly be directed to revise the final result (P-5) of the Police Constable recruitment process qua the Petitioner.” CWP No.18348 of 2025 “(i) That the respondent may very kindly be directed to re- check the answer of question No.87 in Series ‘D’ and respondent may very kindly be directed to revise the final result (P-5) of the Police Constable recruitment process qua the Petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances raised by the petitioners in these writ petitions have already been redressed by respondent No.3- H.P. Public Service Commission, on the basis of which, Anmol Kumar Versus State of H.P. and others2 was decided. In view of above, the present writ petitions to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 26, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 CWP No.17964 of 2025, decided on 25.11.2025