Yarra Nageswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLRC/2507/2018 · 2025-07-03
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37799 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37799 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
> :610662632018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAYJHE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2507 OF 2018 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, against the order dt.22-12-2017 passed in CrI.M.P. No.1405 of 2017 in C.C.No.567 of 2015 on the file of II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. Between: Yarra Nageswara Rao, S/o Yarra Venkataramana, Aged about 33 years, Occ. R/o. D.No.9-18-1, Maruthi Vinayagar Enclave, CBM Compound, Visakhapatnam City, Working as Public Bureau in Charge ...Petitioner/Accused AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
2. S Ramesh, S/o Bhogesu, Aged 31 years, Occ. SI of police, II Town Traffic PS Visakhapatnam City, R/o Flat No. 302, Akshya Rams Enclave Dandu Bazar, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents/Complainant
\A NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance in C.C.No. 567/2015 on the file of the II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakapatanam, pending disposal of the above CRL.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K Sairam Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order:
APHC010662632018 N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO- 9j^n7/9niP [3521] Between:
1.YARRA NAGESWARA RAO, OCC R/0 DNOQIRi VINAYAGAR ENCLAVE, CBM COMPOUND WORKING AS PUBLIC BUREAU IN CHARGE MARUTHI VISAKHAPATNAM CITY ...PETITIONER AND ^ ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PI IRI ir PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD 2.S RAMESH, OCC. SI OF POLICE II TOWN TRAFFir pq VISAKHAPATNAM CITY R/0 FLAT NO. 302 ^AKSHYA^ ^MS ENCLAVE DANDU BAZAR, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM^ ...RESPONDENT(S): —
" J'Tn ""Z,"f ®2l aside Ihe order dt.22-12-2017 passed in CrI.M.P. No.1405 of 2017 in C.C.No 567 of 2015 h^r ?R r Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam the CrI.R.C. and pass.
lA NO: 1 OF ?ni« Revision filed under Section 397/401 on by allowing In circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the order dated 22 12 2017 Chtef on the fiiroffhe I^AdJl ^ hief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakapatanam in the interest of justice and X / lA NO: 2 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance in C.C.No. 567/2015 on the file of the appearance in C.C.No.567/2015 on the file of the II Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakapatanam, pending disposal of the above CRL.R.C. and pass lANO: 3 0F 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 165 days in filing the above revision against the Order dated 22.12.2017 passed in CrI MP No.1405/2017 in CC.No.567/2015 on the file of II additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of revision case before this Honorable Court and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KSAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main case i.e., C.C.No.567 of 2015 was ended in acquittal wc/e judgment dated 13.05.2022.
2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication.
3. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam district, (with records)
2. One CC to Sri. K Sairam Murthy Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi [OUT]
4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section Pradesh.
5. Two CD Copies Pradesh at High Court of Andhra Stu VNA
^ I f HIGH COURT DATED;04/07/2025 C i i 1
ORDER CRLRCNO. 2507 OF 2018 f DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION INFRUCTUOUS CASE AS