M/S. THE TIKKAVANIPALEM LLMALCCS LTD.,REP.BY CHAIRMAN,VSKPTM v. THE NTPC LTD., REP. BY AGM(C&M), VISAKHAPATNAM, & ANR.
WP/21479/2011 · 2025-08-10
Sumathi Jagadam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37790 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37790 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010662742011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21479/2011 Between:
1. M/S. THE TIKKAVANIPALEM LLMALCCS LTD.,REP.BY CHAIRMAN,VSKPTM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, T. SATYANARAYANA TIKKAVANIPALEM, DALAIPALEM POST, PARAVADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM - 21.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE NTPC LTD REP BY AGMCM VISAKHAPATNAM ANR, REP. BY ITS AGM (C&M), SIMHADRI THERMAL POWER PROJECT, NTPC SIMHADRI, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. UTILITY POWERTECH LIMITED, REP. BY ITS RESIDENT MANAGER (A JV OF NTPC LTD., & RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.), (SIMHADRI THERMAL POWER PROJECT), PARAVADA - VISAKHAPATNAM - 531 020.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writy, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandmaus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not giving the tender form to the petitioner society as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice by depriving the livelihood of the members of the Petitioner Society and consequently direct the respondents to issue the tender form to the petitioner society herein and permit petitioner society to participate in the tender for the yer 2011-12.
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 26142 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to stay the opening of the tender scheduled to be held on 1st August 2011 in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GODA RAMALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G SUDHA The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.08.2025 SR
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 21479/2011
Date: 11.08.2025
SR