ASHA SHARMA v. PANKAJ MANGOTRA VICE CHAIRMAN JDA AND ANOTHER
CCP(S)/214/2022 · 2025-08-04
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3779 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3779 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CCP(S) No. 214/2022 in WP(C) No. 3961/2019
Asha Sharma …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sachin, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas Mangotra, Advocate
Vs
Pankaj Mangotra vice Chairman JDA and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 04.08.2025
01. Mr. Sachin, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order stands complied with. He has instructions not to pursue the instant contempt petition any further.
02. His statement is taken on record.
03. In the light of the aforesaid, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any framed, shall stand discharged.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
04.08.2025
Riya
S. No. 25