Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37789 (RAJ)

SONIYA KUMARI D/O BALVEER v. RAVINDRA KUMAR SON OF SHRI KESHAV SINGH

CRLMP/4477/2025 · 2025-10-03

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40113] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4477/2025 Soniya Kumari D/o Balveer, Aged About 33 Years, Resident of Nagla Tejsingh, Near Cimco Wagon Factory, Bharatpur, at Present Working as UDC Govt. Secretariat, Medical Department, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus Ravindra Kumar Son of Shri Keshav Singh, Aged About 28 Years, Resident of Dayawali, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj). Mob- 7424858647. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 03/10/2025 1. By means of filing of instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner has impugned the interlocutory order dated 03.06.2025 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadbai, District Bharatpur in Criminal Case No. 428/2022, declining to interfere with the order of cognizance taken against the petitioner vide order dated 13.09.2022 for offences under Section 138 of the NI Act, on the Criminal Complaint filed by the respondent. 2. The contention of counsel for petitioner is that in respect of misusing of cheques in question, on the behest of petitioner one FIR No. 184/2022 at Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur came to be lodged for offences under Sections 379, 467 and 468 [2025:RJ-JP:40113] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4477/2025] of IPC wherein after investigation, charge-sheet for alleged offences has been filed against the complainant and criminal case is pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadbai, District Bharatpur. 3. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move an application before the concerned Sessions Judge to make a prayer to club both the criminal cases and to run the trial together. 4. In view of above, instant petition stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /5