SMT. KAVITA W/O BASAVARAJ ANGADI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/102436/2024 · 2025-09-24
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37785 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37785 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13101 WP No. 102436 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102436 OF 2024 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. KAVITA W/O. BASAVARAJ ANGADI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. BEDAVATTI, TQ: YELBURGA, DIST: KOPPAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND WOMEN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-01.
2.
THE CHILD AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE, YELBURGA-583236.
3.
THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, KOPPAL-583231.
4.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL-583231.
5.
SMT. GEETA W/O. BEERAPPA HUBBALLI, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI ASSISTANT, R/O. SIRUR (PUNARVASATIGRAMA), DIST: KOPPAL-583231. …RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13101 WP No. 102436 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED THE RESOLUTION/PROCEEDINGS OF THE YELBURGA TALUKA ANGANWADI WORKERS/ASSISTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE, HEADED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 BEARING NO. NIL DATED 13/06/2023, WHEREIN IT IS DECIDED THAT, RESPONDENT NO.5 BE GIVEN PROMOTION FROM SHIRUR-2 ANGANWADI ASSISTANT POST TO BEDAVATTI-1 ANGANWADI CENTRE WORKER POST BY GIVING PROMOTION TO HER VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO MAKE DIRECT RECRUITMENT BY CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 51