[2025:RJ-JP:40717-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Contempt Petition No. 9/2025 In Re- ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Tarachand Sharma, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 2. Mohanswaroop Sharma, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 3. Maheshchand Sogarwal, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 4. Gandhidev, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 5. Jaswant Singh, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 6. Bhagwat Singh Advocate, District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 7. Vivek Hathaini, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 8. Gulabsingh Kuntal, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 9. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 10. Harkesh Singh, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 11. Pradeep Vashisth, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 12. Dharmendra Agarwal, Advocate District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) 13. Rupendra Singh, Advocate, President Bar Association, Bharatpur District And Session Court Bharatpur (Raj) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Ms. Dhirit Laddha. For Respondent(s) : Dr. Mahesh Sharma. Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar. Mr. Himat Singh Bnikarwar. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order [2025:RJ-JP:40717-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLCP-9/2025] 07/10/2025 The present contempt petition has been initiated on the basis of reference by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Bharatpur, with regard to the incidents which have occurred on account of agitation initiated by the lawyers relating to some incidents which has occurred in the Court. Reply has been filed to the contempt petition on behalf of all the respondents. Except two respondents due to some medical emergency in their family all others are present in the Court. In para No.22 of the reply, all the contemnors have submitted unconditional apology. They have stated with regard to their respect for the majesty of this Court and showed full faith in the judiciary & the rule of law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the reply filed on behalf of the respondents while accepting the unconditional apology, we deem it just and proper to close the contempt proceedings. In that view of the matter, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/91