Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37780 (AP)

ADDAGADDA SUBBARAYUDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/9700/2022 · 2025-09-18

K Suresh Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010662012022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. ADDAGADDA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 2. ADDAGADDA SIVAPARVATHI, W/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. R/O R/O MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. ADDAGADDA THIRUPATHAIAH, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. JAGARLAMUDI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. JAGARLAMUDI LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADES PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9700/2022 ADDAGADDA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, ADDAGADDA SIVAPARVATHI, W/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. R/O R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ADDAGADDA THIRUPATHAIAH, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. JAGARLAMUDI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 , R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, JAGARLAMUDI LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3239] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY ADDAGADDA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, ADDAGADDA SIVAPARVATHI, W/O SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU ADDAGADDA THIRUPATHAIAH, S/O MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O R/O KUNKALAMARRU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU JAGARLAMUDI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 , R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, JAGARLAMUDI LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) H, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT 2. SRI RAAVI RAMANAIAH, S/O MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O DEVARAPALLI VILLAGE, PARCHUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. (DEFACTO COMPLAINANT) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the FIRT No. 63 of 2022 on the file of the Karamchedu Police Station, Bapatla District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in connection with Crime No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Karamchedu Police Station, Bapatla District, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. RAJA REDDY KONETI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Balaji Medamalli, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the main Calendar Case itself was ended in acquittal and as such, the cause in the present Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ K SURESH REDDY, J Date: 19.09.2025 MVA