[2025:RJ-JP:50140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19307/2025 Digvijay Singh Rathor S/o Shri Nand Bhanwar Singh Rathor, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Post Kurdiya, Tehsil Jahazpur District Bhilwara ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Directorate Office, Lal Kothi, Jaipur 3. Additional Director General Of Police, (Recruitment And Promotion Board) Rajasthan Jaipur 4. Superintendent Of Police, Chhitorgarh Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “By an appropriate writ, direction in the order nature and thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to grant six months time to the petitioner for appearing in PST/PET in pursuance to the Constable Recruitment 2025 advertised under Advertisement dated 9.4.2025. The respondents may kindly be further directed that after conducting PST/PET if the petitioner found eligible on merits give appointment to the petitioner on the post of [2025:RJ-JP:50140] (2 of 3) [CW-19307/2025] Constable General Non TSP under General-EWS category under the command control of the respondent No.4 in pursuance to the said Advertisement dated 9.4.2025 with consequential benefits.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.08.2020 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16652/2019 titled as Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. Reported in (2019) 13 SCC 706. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of three days with all relevant documents and the respondents-Authority is consider to the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Nitin Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of UP and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation decide with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three days [2025:RJ-JP:50140] (3 of 3) [CW-19307/2025] from date of receipt of representation, but before 14.12.2025. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then he is entitled for same benefits. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /290