IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 133 CWP-8333-2025 Date of Decision: 25.03.2025 KARTIK SINGH ... Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Raghav Chhabra, Advocate for Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to issue/release the result of the petitioner who has already cleared the required exams and interview as conducted by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner belongs to General Category and had applied for the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces, SSF, Rifles Man (GD) in Assam Rifles and Sepoy in Narcotics Control Bureau Examination 2022. The petitioner fulfilled all requisite criteria and participated in the Exams. However, the respondents have, for no valid reasons, withheld the result of the petitioner and have not declared the same till date. Notice of motion. RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.26 03:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8333-2025 -2- Ms. Shalini Atri, Sr. Panel Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and prays for some time to seek instructions and file response, if so advised. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that he would be satisfied at this stage, in case respondent No.5- Regional Director, North West Regional office, Staff Selection Commission, Chandigarh is directed to treat the present petition as a representation and to consider and decide the same by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, in view of the above; with the consent of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of while directing respondent No.5 to treat the present writ petition as a representation and to consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties within a period of two months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MARCH 25, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.26 03:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document