APHC010659922022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1154/2022 Between: Paleti @ Pidathala Naveen Chandra ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: M Ravindra Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: I.A.No.1 of 2024 The petition is filed to implead the de-facto complainant/wife as 2nd respondent. 2. Heard both sides. Petition is allowed. I.A.No.2 of 2024 3. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent/de-facto complainant are present. 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1154 of 2022 Dated 07.08.2025 4. A joint memo has been filed by the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, stating that an amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- has been paid to the 2nd respondent towards full and final settlement of the dispute between them. An affidavit has also been filed by the 2nd respondent, granting permission to compromise and settle the case with the petitioner. 5. For the reasons mentioned in the petition, the petition is allowed permitting the 2nd respondent to compromise with the petitioner. I.A.No.3 of 2024 6. The petition is filed by the 2nd respondent to compound the offence. 7. Permission is accorded. 8. The 2nd respondent is permitted to compound the offence with the petitioner. 9. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed as compromised. The petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. 10. In view of the above reasons, I.A.Nos.1 to 3 of 2024 are allowed, permitting both parties to compromise the case. Respondent No.2 is permitted to compound the offence with the petitioner. 11. Accordingly, the I.A.Nos.1 to 3 of 2024 are allowed, and the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised by compounding the offence. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1154 of 2022 Dated 07.08.2025 Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur, in C.C.No.563 of 2016, dated 11.09.2018, as confirmed in Criminal Appeal No.280 of 2018, dated 23.11.2018, by the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Gudur, are set aside, as a result, the petitioner is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. 12. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.08.2025 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1154 of 2022 Dated 07.08.2025 235 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1154 OF 2022 07.08.2025 W KMS