[2025:RJ-JP:40960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13139/2015 1. Krishna Murari, aged about 42 years, S/o Sh. Ramdutta Sharma, R/o Village & Post Nakrasar, Tehsil & District Churu (Raj.) 2. Alok Agnihotri, aged about 37 years, S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Agnihotri, R/o E-31, Civil Lines, Sriganganagar, District Sriganganagar (Raj.) 3. Praveen Khatri, aged about 37 years, S/o Sh. Narayan Das Khatri, R/o House No.92, Ward No.9, Old Abadi, Sriganganagar, District Sriganganagar (Raj.) 4. Santosh S/o Sh. Ramchander, aged about 36 years, R/o 1184, Central Govt. Residential Complex, NH-4, Faridabad (Haryana). 5. Rajkumari D/o Sh. Indrajit Vishnoi, aged about 32 years, R/o VPO Bhupalpura, Tehsil Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar (Raj.). 6. Shiv Kumar Sharma, aged about 40 years, S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma, R/o Aaseri Guest House, Near Shiv Colony, Churu, District Churu (Raj.). 7. Rajesh Kumar Khichad, aged about 35 years, S/o Sh. Bhagwan Ram Khichad, R/o Street No.7, Ambedker Colony, Patel Nagar, Bikaner, District Bikaner. 8. Dharmpal Vishnoi, aged about 36 years, S/o Sh. Poona Ram, R/o Village Jhotra, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer. 2. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Reena D/o Jagdish Prasad, aged about 26 years, R/o Ward No.15, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) 4. Mahesh Kumar Jat S/o Sh. Pooran Chand, aged about 32 years, R/o Gudha Rampur, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar (Raj.) 5. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Bishan Singh, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Blrodi Bari, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 6. Dr. Goverdhan Lal Sharma S/o Sh. Surajmal Sharma, aged about 45 years, R/o 81, Vishvesariya Vistar, Triveni Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Yashpal Ahuja, S/o Sh. Gahesn Kumar Ahuja, aged about 39 [2025:RJ-JP:40960] (2 of 4) [CW-13139/2015] years, R/o SE-233 GNV Colony, Bikaner (Raj.) 8. Dr. Priyanka D/o Sh. Ramavtar, aged about 36 years, R/o 115, Mahaveer Nagar, Sanghi Farm, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 9. Deshraj S/o Sh. Daleep Kumar, aged about 34 years, R/o Trirajwala, Tehsil Peelibanga, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) 10. Sunil Kumar S/o Sh. Ramkumar Dhanka, aged about 31 years, R/o 23 LLW, Puccasarana, Hanumangarh (Raj.) 11. Kulraj Meena S/o Sh. Ramkumar Dhanka, aged about 31 years, R/o 7 Nandpuri Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 12. Chandrashekhar Bhandari, S/o Sh. Narayan Lal, aged about 40 years, R/o Amilwada, 448 Rishabdhev, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur. 13. Garima Lata D/o Sh. Devendra Prasad Lata, aged about 31 years, R/o Plot No.3-GA-15, Pavanpuri Volony, Bikaner (Raj.) 14. Vijayesh Kumar Pandya S/o Sh. Arjun Lal, aged about 34 years, R/o VPO Biluda, Tehsil Sangwara, District Dungarpur (Raj.) 15. Bhagwan Karamchandani S/o Sh. P.H. Karmchandani, aged about 41 years, R/o 187, Dishjay Nagar, Pali (Raj.) 16. Shivpal Jat S/o Sh. Udaram Jat, aged about 37 years, R/o Post Roopgarh, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, Khatiwas, Sikar (Raj.) 17. Mahaveer Prasad Sharma S/o Sh. Ramavtar Sharma, aged about 39 years, R/o 3-B/21, Sukhadia Nagar, Ganganagar (Raj.) 18. Suresh Chand Meena S/o Sh. Ramphool Meena, aged about 26 years, R/o Village Chatrapura, Post Dantly, Tehsil Sanganer Via Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj.) 19. Niraj Kumar S/o Sh. Babu Lal Meena, aged about 26 years, R/o 247, Medkapura, Jamalpur, Hindone, Karauli (Raj.) 20. Vikas Rajpurohit S/o Sh. P.S. Rajpurohit, aged about 32 years R/o 126 Doctors Colony, DCM Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 21. Seema Yadav S/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh Yadav, aged about 29 years, R/o Plot No.9, Shriramnagar, Kalwad Road Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) 22. Sumitra Pareek D/o Sh. Shyam Lal Pareek, aged about 32 years, R/o 56 Nanupuri Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.) 23. Prem Dhande D/o Sh. Roopram, aged about 32 years, R/o Chelak Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer (Raj.) 24. Mukesh Kumar Moond S/o Sh. Dhanaram Moond, aged about 31 years, R/o Post Piprali, Tehsil Piprali, District Sikar (Raj.) 25. Binja Ram S/o Sh. Peera Ram aged about 33 years, R/o 29- B, Gali No.2, Shakit Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.) [2025:RJ-JP:40960] (3 of 4) [CW-13139/2015] 26. Lokendra Singh S/o Sh. Girraj Sharan, aged about 29 years, R/o Hingoli, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 27. Lakhan Singh S/o Sh. Babu Lal, aged about 41 years, R/o Rajeev Colony, Deeg, Bharatpur (Raj.) 28. Shyam Sunder Vishnoi S/o Sh. Malla Ram Vishnoi, aged about 26 years, R/o Vishnoi Mohalla, Jaroda Khurd, Village Panchayat Jaroda Kalan, Panchayat Samiti Merta, District Nagaur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Jai Lodha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Keshav Parashar for Mr. Ashwini Jaiman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 08/10/2025 The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- "It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may kindly call for the entire record pertaining to the RAS Examination 2012 may kindly be summoned and after examining the same; By further writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to cancel the same and declared then null and void and similarly direct that enquiry be conducted by the CBI qua the aforesaid RAS Examination 2012 as has been done and cancelled in case the RAS Examination 2013 on similar set of facts and evidence and accordingly direct conducting enquiry of an independent agency i.e. CBI By further writ, order or direction, the RAS Examination 2012 be declared as invalid in the facts and circumstances of the case and the respondents be directed to conduct the RAS Examination 2012 afresh and prepare the merit list afresh after holding the proper enquiry as stated supra. The selected candidates of the RAS Exam 2012 be declares as invalid candidates and the State Govt. be directed not to act upon the selection list of 2012 RAS exam. Any other appropriate order or direction, which may be considered in the facts & circumstances of the [2025:RJ-JP:40960] (4 of 4) [CW-13139/2015] case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioners." Learned counsels for the respondents submits that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands squarely covered by the order dated 05.11.2015 passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of "Raghunath Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12893/2015" and he prays that this matter may also be decided in the light of the aforesaid judgment. The operative portion of the aforesaid order reads as under:- "The process of selection for RAS and RTS combined Competitive Examination, 2012 has already been over because selection list has already been forwarded to the Government and without impleading all selected candidates, this writ petition has been filed to challenge the selection process, therefore, at this stage when process of selection has already been completed, no intereference is called for upon the grounds raised in this writ petition with regard to wrong answers of some questions. Hence, this writ petition is hereby dismissed." The present petition has been filed in order to challenge the selection process and the process of selection has already been completed, hence, no interference is called for. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of in the light of the aforesaid judgment. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /96