1 2025:CGHC:13918 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 688 of 2021 • Geeta Bai Rajak W/o Itwari Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Majgaon , Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Baldau S/o Sudheram Dhobi Aged About 52 Years R/o Koyalari , Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Pusai Wd/o Kanahhiya Dhobi Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Pachbhaiyya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3. Ashok S/o Kanahhiya Dhobi Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Pachbhaiyya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.] 4. Kumar S/o Dwarika Dhobi Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Pachbhaiyya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 5. Santosh S/o Dwarika Dhobi Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Pachbhaiyya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 6. Kamal S/o Dwarika Dhobi Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Pachbhaiyya, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 7. Ramji S/o Peelaram Dhobi Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Saihamalgi , Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 8. Janki Wd/o Hariram Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Majgao, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 9. Anuj S/o Peelaram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Saihamalgi, Tehsil Panderiya , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 10.Geeta Bai Wd/o Bihari Dhobi Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Saihamalgi, Tehsil Panderiya , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 11.Kailash S/o Bihari Dhobi Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Saihamalgi, Tehsil Panderiya , District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.22 16:55:00 +0530 2 12.State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector , Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Manohar Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 7 : Mr. Harishankar Patel, Advocate and 9 to 11 For State/Respondent No. 12 : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22. 03.2025 1. Mr. Harishankar Patel, Advocate would submit that Civil Suit filed by the respondents No. 1 to 7/plaintiffs was dismissed vide order dated 23.10.2021 according to the provisions of Order 22 Rule 4 and 4 (a) of CPC, and therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable. 2. Perusal of the order dated 23.10.2021 would show that Civil Suit filed by respondents No. 1 to 7/plaintiffs was dismissed, and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant