Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37756 (JHR)

JAMSHED ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2491/2025 · 2025-09-26

Sanjay Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30677 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P No. 2491 of 2025 ------ Jamshed Alam ……Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Roushan Tara 3. Md. Kaushar Anari @ Koushar Ansari 4. Ahmad Raza ....…Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P ------ Order No: 02/ Dated: 26.09.2025 This Cr.M.P No. 2491 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Cr. Revision No. 1016 of 2024 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 07.04.2025 passed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that due to inadvertence, the order dated 07.04.2025 passed by this Court could not complied within time and Criminal Revision No. 1016 of 2024 stood dismissed due to pre-emptory order. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also deposited Rs. 60,000/- (Rs. Sixty Thousand) by way of demand draft in the name of Respondent No. 2 before the learned Court below and hence, this Cr.M.P No. 2491 of 2025 may be restored. 3. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection. 2025:JHHC:30677 2 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and in view of the averments made in Para Nos. 4 and 5 of Cr.M.P No. 2491 of 2025, the prayer for the restoration of Cr. Revision No. 1016 of 2024 is allowed and Cr. Revision No. 1016 of 2024 is restored to its original file. 5. Accordingly, Cr.M.P No. 2491 of 2025 is allowed. 6. It has been informed that the requisites have also been filed in Cr. Revision No. 1016 of 2024. 7. Accrodingly, Office is directed to proceed further. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated: 26.09.2025 Avinash/