Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37751 (CHH)

ROSHAN SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/471/2025 · 2025-08-25

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43142-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 471 of 2025 Roshan Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Kailash Thakur Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Pali, Near Government Primary School, P.S. Pali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Undertrial Prisoner-Through Next Friend Wife Namely Smt. Pratibha Singh Thakur, W/o Shri Roshan Singh Thakur, Aged About 40 Year, R/o Village Pali, Near Government Primary School, P.S. Pali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General of Police Police Head Quarters, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General of Police IG Office, Near Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintendent of Police Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Station House Officer P.S. Pali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sanjay Bhavnani S/o Shri Nanakram Bhavnani Aged About 45 Years R/o Near Hemant Hospital, Janpad Road, Pali, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.08.26 16:44:24 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 26.08.2025 1 When the matter is taken up, Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that on instructions, he does not wish to press the present petition any further. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 In view of the aforesaid submissions and considering the fact that the petitioner himself does not intend to pursue the matter, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu