Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3775 (PAT)

Syed Shahnawaz Wajeeh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./75058/2025 · 2026-03-19

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75056 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Praveen Kumar @ Pinda S/O Sadhu Ray R/O Village- Kailachak, P.S.- Bidhupur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.386 of 2025, dated 07.06.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per the FIR, when the informant and his colleague were riding on their respective motorcycles after making collection of Rs.74,500/- and Rs.88,460 respectively, they were intercepted by three unknown criminals and after putting them on gun point took the money and mobile phones from them. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He further submits that there is no recovery of incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner and the articles, which is said to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75056 of 2025(5) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 have form part of the seizure list is not connected with the petitioner. He further submits that the investigation is complete and chargesheet has also been submitted in this case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 09.06.2025. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent. 6. Considering the period of custody and that the chargesheet has already been submitted, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.386 of 2025. shikha/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T