Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37745 (RAJ)

KUNJ BIHARI SAINI S/O SHRI PURAN MAL SAINI v. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8070/2022 · 2025-10-28

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43155] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8070/2022 Kunj Bihari Saini S/o Shri Puran Mal Saini, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village - Kesari Singh Pura, Tehsil-Baswa, District-Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. University Of Rajasthan, Through Its Registrar, University Of Rajasthan, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director, Pandit Badri Prasad T.T. College, E-1, RICCO Industrial Area Kolana, Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Bhawani Singh Shekhawat Mr.Ananth Shankar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.Ajit Maloo Mr.Indresh Sharma with Ms.Shalini Yadav & Mr.Rajesh Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 28/10/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “(i) By issue an appropriate writ or direction to the respondent to permit to appear to upcoming exam of B.Sc. B.Ed. 4th year going to held very soon and arrange practical examination to the petitioner. (ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction any other appropriate relief to which the petitioner is found entitled to may also kindly be granted in their favour.” [2025:RJ-JP:43155] (2 of 2) [CW-8070/2022] 2. This Court vide interim order dated 01.09.2022 has permitted the petitioner to appear in B.Sc. B.Ed. Part-IV examination-2022 provisionally and it was further directed that result of the petitioner shall not be declared without permission of this Court. 3. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.10.2024 has directed the respondent-University to produce the result of the petitioner in a sealed cover before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-University has produced mark-sheet of the petitioner of 4th year examination-2022 in a sealed cover and the same shows that the petitioner had not succeeded in the said examination. 5. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the present writ petition to be adjudicated by this Court, however it will be open for the petitioner to seek his remedy, if / as available, under the law. 6. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J Monika/27