Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37742 (HP)

PARVEEN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/17654/2025 · 2025-11-13

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17654 of 2025 Decided on: 13th November, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parveen Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Non-Medical) at Government High School, Sakori U/C Government Senior Secondary School Chail, District Solan, H.P. It is his case that on completion of normal tenure at the aforesaid place of posting, which is far-flung 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 area from his home town, he preferred representation on 31.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) outlining therein adverse family circumstances being faced by him and on that basis prayed for his transfer. His representation has not been considered and decided by the competent authority till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to consider and decide his representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy, within a period of four weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 13, 2025 Judge yogesh