Union of India rep. by the Director General (DG) v. Ramayanam Sreekanth,
WP/38409/2012 · 2025-03-25
A Hari Haranadha Sarma, B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37741 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37741 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010658572012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3527] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 38409/2012 Between: Union Of India Rep. By The Director General (dg) and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Ramayanam Sreekanth and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. Y V ANIL KUMAR (Central Government Counsel) Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2 HBKM,J& HAHHS,J W.P.No.38409 of 2012
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the petitioners that the 1st respondent died on 08.12.2023 during the pendency of the writ petition and it is a matter for
consideration of promotion for the 1st respondent.
3. Pursuant to the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal passed in O.A.No.439 of 2012 dated 27.07.2012, the petitioner had also attained the age of superannuation even before his date of death. In view of the same, this writ petition cannot be proceeded with further.
5. Recording the above said statement, this writ petition is closed. Interim
order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA,J 25.03.2025 PGT