Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3774 (PNJ)

DR. HARJINDER KAUR v. SANT TARLOK SINGH AND ANOTHER

COCP/1400/2025 · 2026-05-04

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 224 Dr. Harjind Sant Tarl Educationa District Ka CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated this Court Punjab and to responde as referred without aw within a per order. The The respon allowance, Tribunal…. COCP-1400-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1400 of Date of decision : arjinder Kaur Versus Tarlok Singh, President, Sant ational and Charitable Trust, Village ict Kapurthala and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Ad for the respondents. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 24.5.2023 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CWP-29425-2022 titled as “H b and others”, whereby the petition was pondent No.5 therein “….to take call up rred to by the Management in the com awaiting further orders of the Tribu a period of 08 weeks from the date of r The parties shall appear before the DP spondents-Management shall pay ce, in accordance with law till the ma l…..”. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 400 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-04.05.2026 …..Petitioner Sant Majha Singh Karamjot illage and Post office Maksudpur, …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA m, Advocate has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of as “Harjinder Kaur vs. State of n was disposed of with a direction ll upon the order dated 05.5.2022 communication dated 18.8.2022 ribunal and to take a final call of receipt of certified copy of this e DPI on 07.6.2023 at 10.00 a.m. ay the arrears of subsistence e matter is finally decided by the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document time to file No.1 and 2 10.2.2026, sought adjou appears on b respondents respondents the petitione R-1/1 annex of responde petitioner as behalf of le required. A amounts rel accordance May 04, 202 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-1400-2025 (O & M) On 30.10.2025, learned counsel to file rejoinder to the written statement f and 2. Thereafter, on the next date i.e 026, learned proxy counsel appeared t adjournment. The needful has not been don rs on behalf of petitioner. It is inter alia submitted b ndents that in compliance of the Writ Co ndents were directed to make payment of titioner, which has been duly released to annexed with the Written Statement dat spondents. It is submitted that therefor oner as on date. Heard. In view of the submissions n f of learned counsel for the responden red. Accordingly, the present contempt p Needless to say, if the petitio nts released to her, she would be at libe dance with law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 ounsel for the petitioner had sought ment filed on behalf of respondents ate i.e. the last date of hearing i.e. eared on behalf of petitioner and en done till date. Further, none ted by learned counsel for the rit Court order dated 24.5.2023, the ent of the subsistence allowance to sed to the petitioner vide Annexure nt dated 08.10.2025 filed on behalf erefore nothing is due against the ons noted herein above made on ondents, no further directions are empt petition stands disposed of. petitioner is dissatisfied with the at liberty to challenge the same in any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.04 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document