Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010271882024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/29/2025 SANJAY BHUMIJ S/O. LATE KHAGEN BHUMIJ, R/O. LINE NO. 1, RANGOITING TEA ESTATE, RANGAMATI, P/S. DERGAON, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM.
2:SMTI SUMAN BHUYAN D/O. LATE PARBIN BHUYAN R/O. RONGALITLING TEA ESTATE DIKULINE P/S. DERGAON DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. P B BORDOLOI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 05.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Ms. P.B. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits
Page No.# 2/2 that there is a delay of 47 days in preferring the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
2. It is also noticed that in the Office Note dated 25.04.2025 it has been stated that service in respect of respondent no.2 has been completed.
3. Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
4. Accordingly, the delay of 47 days is condoned.
5. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
6. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant