Item No. 346 Ct 32 rup 02.09. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 3400 of 2024 With IA NO: CRAN 2 of 2025 Rituparna Das Vs. Sayantan Das & Ors. Mr. Kiron C. Saha, … for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Ms. Sofia Nasar, Mr. Santanu Sett. … for the opposite parties. 1. Both the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties to this revisional application are present. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties has submitted that learned Trial Court hauled the proceeding owing to pendency of the application, which is not maintainable in the eye of law. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has prayed for time. 4. In these circumstances, I make it clear that there is no stay order promulgated by this Court to stay the proceeding pending before the Trial Court. 5. Let the matter appear one week after the ensuing puja vacation, 2025. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2