2025:JHHC:37535 1 A.B.A. No. 7126 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 7126 of 2025 ---- 1.Dugru Mahto @ Dagru Mahto, son of Jalo Mahto, aged about 40 years resident of Village Satuvabad PO-Deoghar and Police Station Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand 2.Mithun Mahto @ Mithun Kumar Yadav, son of Guddu Mahto @ Guddu Prasad Yadav, aged about 25 years resident of Village Satuvabad, Post Office Noni and PS Chitra, Dist. Deoghar, Jharkhand 3.Nimu Mahto @ Nimu Nimay Kumar Mahto @ Nimo Mahto @ Nimoy Yadav aged about 33 years son of Fulu Mahto resident of Vilage Satuwabad, PO Noni and PS Chitra District Deoghar, Jharkhand 4.Vikas Mahto @ Bikash Kumar Yadav @ Bikash Yadav aged about 25 years son of Nirmal Prasad Yadav resident of Satuwabad, PO Noni and PS Chitra Dist. Deoghar, Jharkhand 5.Pappu Mahto @ Bablu Yadav, aged about 34 years son of Jalo Mahto @ Jalo Yadav, resident of Satuwabad PO Noni and PS Chitra Dist. Deoghar Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Satish Kr Keshri, Advocate ---- 2/12.12.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chitra PS Case No.58 of 2025, for offence registered under section 115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Madhupur. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that scuffle took place due to land dispute. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegations and there are case and counter case between the parties and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegation of assault is there and injury has been received by one Sanjay Choudhary 2025:JHHC:37535 2 A.B.A. No. 7126 of 2025 which is grievous. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR it transpires that there is direct allegation against the petitioner no.1 pursuant to that grievous injury has been received, and in view of that, anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.1 namely, Dugru Mahto @ Dagru Mahto is, hereby, rejected. 6. So far as the petitioner nos.2 to 5 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against them and there are case and counter case between the parties and it was pointed out that due to land dispute scuffle took place and accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos.2 to 5. 7. Accordingly, petitioner nos.2 to 5, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioner nos.2 to 5, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Madhupur, in connection with Chitra PS Case No.58 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 12.12.2025 SI/