M/S H.R. Minarals, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/17662/2014 · 2025-09-01
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37737 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37737 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010658142014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17662/2014 Between:
1. M/S H.R. MINARALS,, REP. BY IT'S PROPRITRIX, K. MALAVIKA,GOVINDAMPALLY VILLAGE, OBULAVARIPALLE MANDAL, KADAPA DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS OF A.P., HYDERABAD
2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KURNOOL RURAL CIRCLE, KURNOOL DIST.
3. THE SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, RENIGUNTA BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction, directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner M/S H.R. Minarals, to operate current Account No. 015502000000884 at his branch, by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in blocking the current Account No. 015502000000884 of M/S H.R. Minarals, at Indian Overseas Bank, Renigunta Branch, Chittoor Dist. by his letter Dt.11-06-2014, on the instructions of the 2nd respondent as illegal, improper and against Law
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 22108 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order passed by the 3rd respondent by his letter Dt.11-06-2014, by permitting the petitioner M/S H.R. Minarals, to operate current Account No. 015502000000884, at Indian Overseas Bank,Renigunta Branch, Chittoor Dist. pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2. MIR MASOOD KHAN The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.09.2025 KAS