Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37735 (RAJ)

DESHRAJ S/O ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15446/2025 · 2025-11-25

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47743] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15032/2025 Rajveer S/o Satpal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bara Bas Neekach, Police Station Nauganwa, District Alwar At Present Plot No. 45 Transport Nagar Police Station N E B District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15446/2025 Deshraj S/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Mubarik Pur, P.s. Noagaon, Alwar (Raj.) At Present Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi with Mr. Om Prakash Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/11/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Jobner District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 316(2), 318(3) & 319(2) of B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the affidavit in relation to the compromise (Annexure 3) is already on [2025:RJ-JP:47743] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15032/2025] record. The petitioners are behind the bars since 02.11.2025 & 30.10.2025 respectively. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely-Rajveer S/o Satpal & Deshraj S/o Ashok Kumar, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /177-178