BHOJRAJ SON OF SHRI KALU LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1020/2025 · 2025-07-09
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37729 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37729 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25257] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1020/2025 Bhojraj Son Of Shri Kalu Lal, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through P.P.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Baran, Rajasthan.
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Atru, District Baran Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 991/2025
1. Kalu Lal Son Of Shri Madi Lal, Aged About 80 Years, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, Rajasthan.
2. Smt. Prem Bai Wife Of Shri Kalu Lal, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, Rajasthan.
3. Vinod @ Bhijraj Son Of Shri Kalu Lal, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, Rajasthan.
4. Yash Son Of Shri Vinod @ Bhijraj Son Of Shri Kalu Lal, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City, Rajasthan.
5. Manju Bai Wife Of Shri Vinod @ Bhijraj Son Of Shri Kalu Lal, Resident Of Kunjed, Tehsil Atru District Baran, Presently Resident Of 153-B, Bapu Nagar, Near Aasha Ram Aashram, Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City
[2025:RJ-JP:25257] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-1020/2025] Rajasthan.
6. Nitesh Kumar Son Of Shri Ashok Kumar, Resident Of Brahmpui Anta, Police Station Anta Distict Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through P.P.
2. Rahul Meena Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Meena, Resident Of Bhairupura Chowki, Police Station Bran Sadar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari, Adv. For State : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 09/07/2025
1. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1020/2025 is filed seeking directions for fair and expeditious investigation in FIR No.335/2024, registered at Police Station Atru, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 110 of BNS and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 991/2025 is filed seeking directions for quashing of FIR No.333/2024, registered at Police Station Atru, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 189(2) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that alleged incidence has occurred on 05.10.2024, qua which cross
[2025:RJ-JP:25257] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-1020/2025] FIRs were lodged. It is further submitted that respondent has alleged that the petitioner has inflicted grievous injury upon the victim. It is further submitted that impugned FIR against the petitioner is lodged by the complainant for the reason that possession of the disputed land was awarded in favour of the petitioner in the civil suit by the concerned Court. Further, it is submitted that an interim protection was granted to the petitioners vide order dated 24.04.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 991/2025.
3. Lastly, it is submitted that investigating officer is not conducting the fair investigation in the instant matter, therefore, the petitioner has prayed for fair, transparent and expeditious investigation in the instant matter.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has assured that investigation in the instant matter will be conducted under the supervision of the concerned Superintendent of Police.
5. Having heard and considered the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the respective parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petitions with following directions:-
5.1. That the
order dated 24.04.2025 in
S.B. Criminal
Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 991/2025
is made absolute.
5.2. That no coercive action shall be taken qua the petitioners subject to joining the investigation, whenever called for. It is made clear that the said interim protection is operational till the submission of outcome of the investigation by the investigating authority before the concerned authority.
[2025:RJ-JP:25257] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-1020/2025]
5.3. That concerned Superintendent of Police is directed to supervise the investigation in FIR No.335/2024 and FIR No.333/2024.
5.4. That Superintendent of Police is directed to conclude the investigation, in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders after taking into consideration all material aspects.
6. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed.
7. It is made clear that no prejudice or preconception will be drawn by the concerned Superintendent of Police, on account of passing of the present order.
8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /48-49