[2025:RJ-JP:47966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6341/2025 1. Mr. Chintan Mehta S/o Shri Mahendra Mehta, Director Of Premier Mill Stores Co. Pvt. Ltd. , Workig For Gain At 16, Tirupati Estate, Nr. Gokulesh Petrol Pump, B/h, Suprim Hotel, Narol Ahmedabad, Gujarat- 382405. 2. Mr. S. Devraj Mudaliyar, S/o Shri Santhalingam Mudaliyar, Manager- Administration Premier Mill Stores Co. Pvt. Ltd., Workig For Gain At 16, Tirupati Estate, Nr. Gokulesh Petrol Pump, B/h, Suprim Hotel, Narol Ahmedabad, Gujarat- 382405. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. 2. Aumshivay Engineering Private Limited, Through Its Managing Director Bhagwat Singh Deora S/o Mr. Pratap Singh Deora, Having Its Registered Office At B-21, Bhan Nagar, Queens Road, Kanha Sweets Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302021. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Arnav Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP Mr.Harsh Joshi & Ms.Misha Sharma for Mr.Deepak Chauhan JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/11/2025 1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred for quashing of the F.I.R. No.179/2024 registered with Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 & 120-B of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:47966] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6341/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are neither named in the F.I.R. nor they have any concern whatsoever with the alleged incident for which the aforesaid F.I.R. has been registered against the co-accused persons. Counsel submits that in spite of above, the Police has unnecessarily issued notices to the petitioners under Sections 94/ 179 BNSS and although the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer pursuant to the aforesaid notices, they have been harassed by the Police. Hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor submits that as per the factual report dated 25.11.2025 received from the S.H.O. Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West), the involvement of the petitioners has not been found to be proved, hence, there is no cause of action has arisen qua the petitioners to approach this Court seeking quashing of the aforesaid F.I.R. Counsel submits that the notice under Sections 94/ 179 BNSS was issued to the petitioners for the purpose of making certain query in the investigation and thereafter therein statements have been recorded under Section 180 Cr.P.C. and they have been treated as witness in the instant case. Hence, under these circumstances, the petition is liable to be rejected on this count alone. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned Public Prosecutor and looking to the factual report furnished by the S.H.O. Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (West), this Court finds no reason to entertain this petition as no cause of action has [2025:RJ-JP:47966] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6341/2025] arisen with the petitioners to file the instant criminal misc. petition. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an appropriate application for revival of this petition, in case, the petitioners are treated as an accused by the Investigating Agency during the course of investigation. 7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /32