Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37723 (PNJ)

BALJINDER SINGH BRAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/8238/2025 · 2025-03-25

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 121 Baljinder Singh Brar State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHAR 1. respondents to implement the order dated whereby pay of the petitioner has been refixed w.e.f. 2. raised in the present petition dated 03.02.2025 and reminder dated 27.02.2025, Annexures P respectively, have been submitted, which have response. He, on instructions, respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed the respondents to decide the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Baljinder Singh Brar Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to implement the order dated whereby pay of the petitioner has been refixed w.e.f. Learned counsel would contend that regarding raised in the present petition, legal notice dated dated 03.02.2025 and reminder dated 27.02.2025, Annexures P respectively, have been submitted, which have response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 04.11.2024, request letter IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8238-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate, AG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to implement the order dated 04.07.2024, Annexure P-7, whereby pay of the petitioner has been refixed w.e.f. 1.1.2018. Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim , legal notice dated 04.11.2024, request letter dated 03.02.2025 and reminder dated 27.02.2025, Annexures P-8 to P-10, respectively, have been submitted, which have yet not evoked any prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to legal notice dated 04.11.2024, request letter of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-8238-2025 -2- dated 03.02.2025 and reminder dated 27.02.2025, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 25.03.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.